Barebones and featureless

Late last year, the Economist released an iOS app that one review described as “barebones and featureless, but that’s okay”.  After working with the app for a few weeks, I came to the same conclusion.

In creating an app, the Economist went in a somewhat different direction.  The app is free; anyone can download it to an iOS device.  Once you load the app, you have an option to download and read a selection of content (generally, the magazine’s leaders, or opinion pages).

If you want the full magazine, you have two options: buy a digital-only subscription ($110), or link your app to a print subscription, the route I took (you use a settings screen to add a subscriber number and expiration date for your print edition).  This approach is elegant: print subscribers are not asked to pay twice for the ability to read across different platforms.

The overall interface is text-based and simple, and as a result updates are not onerous: downloads of the entire magazine take about 30 seconds over a wi-fi network in my office. (Yes, I timed it.  I’m geeky like that.)  Because I commute by train, I’ve found myself reading more the magazine’s content than I did with the print subscription alone.

I’ve written that devices (alone) will not save publishing, but there is a lot of good in the approach employed by the Economist.  It augments the print consumption experience, respects the investment made by existing subscribers and brings a weekly update in a manageable amount of time.

The free app also lets new readers sample parts of the magazine, a low-cost approach that could help grow the total number of paid subscriptions.  The Economist app is not just about digital; it’s about using digital to build content awareness and make content consumption easier.  And that’s okay.





Posted by Hugh McGuire
Jan 19, 2011  at  12:29 PM

But how can they compete without video? and transmedia news stories?



Posted by Brian O'Leary
Jan 19, 2011  at  02:14 PM

LOL.. I see your point.  Keep this up and pretty soon people will think we don’t need InDesign to create content.  What kind of a world is this?

After I wrote this post, Jenn Webb sent me a link to coverage of a rumored power play by Apple, which may be trying to limit the kind of print-plus-digital bundling I praise here:

http://bit.ly/hiOPiJ

If so, I think it’s a mistake for Apple: for me, the ability to shift my reading across platforms increases the value of my iPad more than it increases the value of a print subscription to the Economist.  Work things out with the customer in mind, guys.



Posted by Hugh McGuire
Jan 19, 2011  at  02:34 PM

apple is doing a lot of strange/abusive things to devs in the app store. they seem very inconsistent.



Posted by Eoin Purcell
Jan 23, 2011  at  08:27 AM

Of course these magazines could make their websites joys to use on mobile devices and not be dependent on any platform other then the web.

They could make print subscribers busy little online users, migrating them to either digital only or p+d combos none of which would require an apps, just blasting out the message GO TO OUR WEBSITE and ensuring that the website was a smooth and pleasurable visit on any device.

But maybe I’m just being silly!
Eoin



Commenting is closed on this post.