Posted
Jan 25, 2010
Author
Brian O'Leary
Categories
Magazines

Kindle periodicals



Although Amazon recently improved the terms it offers publishers who distribute books on the Kindle, it continues to offer magazine content providers a 30% revenue share.

Given that the device is monochromatic, prices are determined by Amazon and publishers don’t get to establish a relationship with their readers, Ad Age asked, “Why would any magazine or newspaper publisher strike a deal with Amazon?” Their reporting turned up five answers:

- The Kindle footprint is still relatively small, lowering the risk of subscriber cannibalization

- A 30% revenue share without physical cost can improve circulation profitability

- Publications in the Kindle store are seen and bought by the consumers interested in a digital option

- It’s a toe in the water, even if it’s not the solution publishers want

- Contracts are short enough to support a migration, if needed

The article’s headline aptly proclaims, “Pubs flirt with Kindle but don’t carry a torch.” I have to agree.

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

del.icio.us Favicon     Email Favicon     Facebook Favicon     LinkedIn Favicon     Reddit Favicon     StumbleUpon Favicon     TwitThis Favicon    

Comments




Name:

Email (required, but will not be published):

Location:

URL:

Comment

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: