Posted
Dec 5, 2009
Author
Brian O'Leary
Categories
Magazines

BYO device



A couple of months back, I expressed some reservations about a multi-publisher service that had been dubbed “Hulu for Magazines” (HfM).  Today, Teleread features a post examining the loose concatenation of Time Inc., Meredith, Conde Nast, Hearst and News Corp.

Echoing our thoughts about HfM, Chris Meadows asks, can a partnership that has no business model, no lead and apparently three or more competing options for display devices actually succeed?

He might ask another question: why do we need publisher-specific devices?  Seamless integration, content interoperability, standard formats and breadth and depth of content that surrounds a community… yes.  A magazine device?  Not so much.

By the way, this week, you just can’t get a digital-content post out with mentioning News Corp.

Edited December 8 to add: an announcement.

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

del.icio.us Favicon     Email Favicon     Facebook Favicon     LinkedIn Favicon     Reddit Favicon     StumbleUpon Favicon     TwitThis Favicon    

Comments




Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.